|
|
 |
| |
|
Search Home : Computers : Programming : Component Frameworks : Comparison and Review
See Also:
- A Detailed Comparison of CORBA, DCOM and Java/RMI: Feature-by-feature comparison of the differences between CORBA, DCOM, and Java/RMI, with a simple source code example reimplemented in each. By Gopalan Suresh Raj.
- ActiveX Controls vs. JavaBeans: Compares ActiveX controls against JavaBeans, by David Chappell.
- COM versus CORBA: A Decision Framework: The discussion is organized as the following sections: approach, enterprise architecture, background, comparison, and conclusion. The comparison identifies the criteria for specification, object model, services, platform and tool support, and maturity. (Owen Tallman and J. Bradford Kain)
- CORBA no match for Microsoft's DCOM, Ovum report says: The article discusses the Ovum report titled "Ovum Evaluates: Object Request Brokers". (Ron Condon / ComputerWorld)
- Comparing Microsoft Transaction Server to Enterprise JavaBeans: Provides a comparison between MTS and Enterprise JavaBeans. The two models are compared in terms of transactions support, controlling complexity, portability, interoperability, language choice and administration. By Microsoft.
- DCOM and CORBA Side by Side, Step By Step, and Layer by Layer: DCOM/CORBA Comparison.
- Making Sense of Distributed Objects: An assessment of COM, CORBA, and Java/RMI, by David Chappell.
- Microsoft .NET vs. J2EE: How Do They Stack Up?: What exactly is the .NET platform and how does the .NET architecture measure up against J2EE? By Jim Farley, author of Java Distributed Computing and co-author of Java Enterprise in a Nutshell.
- On Being Object-Oriented: COM and CORBA: A comparison of COM and CORBA, by David Chappell.
- Toolkit Comparison: Compares the same program, Klotski, written in Gtk, Qt and PyQT. Descriptions, code samples, tables, statistics, humor. [Open Source]
| |
|
|
